I am Mary Yoder's cousin and still can't understand how anyone would want to kill this beautiful woman. But I also don't understand how Kaitlyn could have been convicted of this crime without any motive and no solid evidence. All of the evidence was circumstantial. I followed the second trial as closely as I could from across the country, and it seems that there was an overwhelming amount of reasonable doubt, and it is mind boggling that a jury would convict her. I do not know Kaitlyn, but I truly believe she was wrongfully convicted based on the amount of reasonable doubt in this case. There seems to be just as much, if not more, circumstantial evidence and motive that would tie Bill or Adam to this senseless murder. I do not know who killed my cousin, but I don't believe there was enough to evidence to convict Kaitlyn.